>>35621612Not that anon but it's honestly wild to me that the voosh x non-compete debate is the only content you are familiar with. That's a voosh deep cut.
If he's a crypto nazi he has certainly been hiding it well.
>he tried to defend himself like 'oh i was just asking questions and playiny devil's advocate'He actually WAS just asking questions. Non-compete was arguing that the oppressed can use any means of violence to overthrow their oppressors as determined by material conditions. Voosh countered by saying the Nazi's believed they were oppressed. Non-compete's rebuttal was that the nazi's were factually wrong, but vaush was trying to cut to the moral question not the factual one. From vooshes point of view, even if the nazis were oppressed by jews, it wouldn't justify the holocaust as a reaction. He was arguing that revolutionary movements should be bound by an ethical framework.
I'm so glad I know all this.
